Shit, I did it again.

Remission

Posted by: Steffi on: September 8, 2010

I’m long overdue, but here it is.

Ciao.

The Paradox of Gender

Posted by: Steffi on: June 26, 2010

I don’t give a shit.

That’s what it feels like. When you wake up in my shoes every day. When you put on a pink thong, a black A&E polo, and a pair of Nike SB’s. That’s what it feels like. It’s the conscious act of indifference and realization. It’s knowing the meaning of certain words and phrases derived from social construct—this reality of roles and tradition. Of signs and signage. Language and behavior. It’s anything derived from everything we wear to everything we do, to every bit of our disjointed characteristic mindset that allows us to function as high-functioning beings under false pretense. It’s that art of being driven by social motivation.

You’re given a task without knowing. because it’s been conditioned, battered and broken inside you since birth. And you call this femininity (or masculinity). But you’re missing the the point. It’s not about feeling one way, or rather, describing in discreet detail what defines one word in contrast to the other. Watch your tongue. It’s not about likening one gender (of which society holds only two) over another or assembling yourself based on definition. It’s not about me wanting to be more masculine, or me wanting to be more feminine or even a mixture of both. It’s about neutrality, and incidentally, the I-don’t-give-a-shits of a genderfucked being.

When you’re born, you know absolutely nothing about etiquette or characteristic gender-driven behaviors. You know nothing about clothes, shoes, toys, dolls, bows, or ties. You’re only conditioned later on in life to differentiate, to distinguish between normalcy and “weird”, or proper and improper. This is how we run a high-functioning society. We’re not high-functioning beings, contrary to popular belief, but as a whole, we’re pretty darn close to it. That’s why “we”—as a whole—work.

Now based on social construct, we wear ourselves in our appropriated gender roles. So why, you ask, would it be anywhere near relevant to deviate from our designated norm? Because A) It’s become so highly fixated in our society that we realize it as simply, a necessity. A chore. Something that you do out of requisite habit like brushing your teeth or taking out the garbage, that you’ve mistakenly detached it from Choice.

See, everything revolves around upkeep. About maintaining a persona in order to validate your identity. But people sometimes get caught up in the singularity of their gender, that they fail to realize they have all the Choice in the world to personify themselves in however way they want in whatever way shape or form.

And B) It’s not about using gender to describe yourself, but rather the other way around. It’s about being yourself and utilizing yourself to break the gender binary. It’s about reinventing gender to suit you, not reinventing yourself to suit gender. That’s what confuses people. In an act to be more or less progressive, they fail to realize that by picking apart a specific gender role and describing every aspect of yourself in terms of discreet masculine/feminine archetypes, that doing so may fuel even greater gender disparity.

And that’s exactly why I-don’t-give-a-shit.

Because gender shouldn’t be held to such a high esteem that you consciously think to yourself, “Hm, I think I’ll be more masculine today by wearing boxer briefs…” No, that’s not what I’m doing. On the contrary, I simply wear boxer briefs out of style and comfort, which can hence be described as masculine. You’re only prescribing yourself to a role, when you have it in your head that roles exist. Technically speaking they do, if you were to consider gender roles as part of a socially-constructed reality, but the point is, gender shouldn’t exist, not if we are to make a reality out of free-choice. It shouldn’t dictate how we feel because first of all, gender is NOT an emotion, nor is it a state of being. You can describe my appearance as masculine (or feminine), but it really doesn’t make any sense to describe a person as either or.

Call me what you want: he, she, sir, ma’am. Honestly, it doesn’t matter to me. People get so wrapped up in definition and binary that they fail to realize that every pronoun (indirect or otherwise) is rooted within gender. If you take gender out of the equation, then you have nothing to describe you as solely masculine or feminine. You’re in essence, a mixture of both, you’re a human being. You were born pure, and if not for our socially gender-constructed world, you wouldn’t know the difference.

Don’t think I’m ready to leave my blog just yet

Posted by: Steffi on: June 9, 2010

I’m still socially and emotionally underdeveloped, BUT I’m working on it. So this here blog of mine stays until something epic and life-altering otherwise consumes my need to talk to myself.

————————————————————————————————————————-

Work. Pedantic pleas and cries, bemoanings, egoistic testosterone-driven morons. All they do is bicker banter babble and gossip like school children by God please stop. And I’m caught in the middle of all this senselessness. This constant need to begrudge others, “prove your point, I’ve proved my point…”—they just talk and talk and talk and talk… The constancy and—I get enough of this in my head. Just shut the fuck up.

So

Posted by: Steffi on: June 7, 2010

I’m pretty sure my IQ level just dove off a cliff since uh spring classes ended. My brain feels like mush, I sound like a dude, I write like a dude, and I probably smell like a dude. Videogaming. It’s uh, it’s something alright. 18 hours of it that one day before work in the afternoon. Didn’t sleep. Didn’t eat. Don’t recall drinking, but I do remember peeing. Yeah. So I’m still suffering from mild withdrawal symptoms, such as: inability to sleep before 8am in the morning, attention deficits, being unable to glue my eyes on the academic prize (aka orgo), and uh, word fluff. Like this “uh” I’ve been constantly puhlastering all over my journal entry.

But I’m happy. I think. Or maybe content‘s a better word to describe my current state of mind-bliss and care-not about chicks or chick-flicks. It’s funny really. I write so much better when I’m depressed and/or emotionally unstable (and don’t get me wrong, I adore my writing ability during these so-called episodes), but I’m just really okay and dare I say, happy with myself at the moment. Who gives a shit if I’m not my philosophical/deranged/vaguely ambiguous/stalkerish self. I’d rather feel… good. I feel good. I’m alright. I’m content, and all is well, and Steffi’s alright. You’re alright. Right? right.

So as I was saying, there’s like this give-or-take tug-of-war type thing always going with me. With people other than me. With objects, emotions, ideas. Things. Like you can’t just expect to play videogames all fucking month long without there being some sort of physiological rewiring of your mental capacity. No, don’t be silly. I mean, even if say, you could—as in, if you were a straight-A student who played a freakishly good sum of videogames—that’s not to say that you’re social abilities would not be compromised. Plain and simple, you’d be a nerd. A social outcast to the norm of everyday conversation. A fucking twat. Because you can’t be a level 127 wizard from Land of Loserville without sacrificing your social life. You can’t get the girl and play an obsessively unhealthy amount of videogames (primarily RPGs) at the same time. Shit just doesn’t happen. It doesn’t. I swear to God so sue me Jesus.

Where was I going with this? Oh, right.

It’s about knowing what you want and knowing what’s important. And sometimes (most of the time) it’s never both. So you have to choose. ‘Cuz there’s always a choice, and really the only obvious choice is with which of the two—emotion or logic—appeals to you the most. Me? I think I lean more towards logic. But only when it comes to girls; I feel the need to absorb and retain all logic before I encounter the female species. They’re a confusing bunch. Always with the mind games and rampart indecision. Bollocks.

But no matter who you are, you’re always gonna want more. Always. I can’t stress that enough. It’s something that’s completely innate, driven, the drive to completely submerge yourself into the it of all its. You want it, but logic tells you No. You can’t have it; it would mean dire with a capital D and emotional turmoil with a capital Fuck You.

And so, we’re all hyprocrites. I tell you to go after your heart because you won’t have another a chance at Girl-A, but fuck, who am I kidding? Have I ever taken my advice? No. Hell no. So why are you taking mine? Because logically, say, if human beings were built on logic as opposed to that other thing called emotion, I would be taking my advice. So the way I see it, if I can’t pull through with what I have to do, then I’m helping you fulfill yours by likening my would-be decision into your head. Which hopefully, you’ll take because your my friend, and I only want the best for you.

That’s really what all friends have in mind when they give advice to their respective friends.

They don’t mean to be hypocrites, they just… they want something, and this thing, whatever it is, they just can’t seem to attain it because they don’t know how (or not yet at least). And it’s the same reason why we surf the net and we read, constantly, and sporadically and obnoxiously, because we’re curious bastards for one, and because… we take these excerpts. Clippings. Quotes. Whatever you wanna call them. Save them, hoard them, and we read them and recite them because we want to be that better person. We want to be that someone that Girl-A looks to, someone she can adore, admire, respect, love. Someone all these damned idealist quotebooks describe.

Fuck it, just be yourself.

I need so desperately to write this down somewhere. I’m drawing verbal blanks, but my mind is racing faster than anything I’ve ever experienced before; my thoughts are so—they’re on rapid-fire right now and what’s being so accurately, and so precisely divulged doesn’t even begin to sum up my nervousness? jittery-ness? I’m having a really hard time writing.

So on my drive home, I was thinking (sort-of)—I was being slightly delusional, for lack of a better term. Sleeplessness, fuck. But it occurred to me that I should really be wary of religious institutions. What I mean is…

———————————————————————————————————-

My mom tried to get me to go to church with the family on Easter. My family’s Roman Catholic, they’re part of the Diocese of Metuchen, they attend mass every Sunday (or Saturday, depending on when they can make it), and I can honestly say, they are true believers in the principles (moral, or otherwise) of Catholicism.

Now, I’m not saying it’s all poppy-cock, bullshit, meant to feed your external ideals, but something she said awhile ago, still bothers me. She was talking about her friend, who, to her knowledge, is not indicted to any type of religious institution. She said that her friend (as well as her friend’s family) has no moral groundset to which she lives her life by because they don’t “belong” to any specific “officialized” religion. Now that’s slightly condescending. How can you so positively claim that just because someone doesn’t belong to a religious institution, that they lack morals, no less faith required to pursue these morals?

How can you claim—how can you believe that you’re this model human being just because you follow a dictation of principles, imposed on you since birth? That’s the reality you live in. You know no other. You don’t realize the hypocrisy of going to church every Sunday, listening to the sermons—the priests that preach to every individual of that congregation, and you—you assume no active role as a Christian on this vast and struggling planet. In our society, for chrissakes. Have you done anything with the time you’ve spent sitting around the house anally cleaning every nook and cranny to satisfy your obsessive needs? Have you?! You haven’t done squat. There’s so many people out there who need help, and all you can think about is, “Wow, so-and-so has no morals because they don’t go to church; I denounce their lifestyle.”

You shouldn’t detest my choice not to attend mass. This is me; you might as well have been talking to me as though I was your friend who chose not to concern herself with any specific religious institution. The thing is, I have morals. I have faith in the ability of the human being to care, to love, to empathize. To do all they can to help others. To help themselves. To think not as a cynic, but as an optimist. That’s the true test of faith; it comes from what you believe in. Your internal sanctity; not this bubble, this petty excuse for a principled life that you lead. Show me you have faith in God, not principle.

And that’s another thing. I’d be a hypocrite to attend an institution that denounces homosexuality as a crime against morality. That is absolutely blasphemous. I’m a human being, not a robot, not a rock, not a furby, or some inanimate tool used to fuel your antagonizing decrees. You can’t live your life by following dictations set aside by like human beings. Because we’re all on the same playing field; we’re all humans; we go through struggles just like everyone else, we have fears, doubts, anxieties… We feel.

Which is why I don’t understand why Principle is such a superseding entity. There’s more to life than making other people’s lives miserable for the sake of some written code of conduct, that consequently disengenders a group of people. People who see through all this bullshit brought on by the upheaval of rigidity and social construct. And since birth you’ve been taught to see the world in a way that blinds your senses, that restrains you from actually seeing the beauty, the fluidity of life. Driving you into this hegemonic society of standards and principle and gender binaries, competitive exclusion, materialism, an ambiguous reality that’s no more of a reality than what’s inside your head.

I was thinking about this idea of marriage the other day. Yet again, another institution. I mean, you either love someone with all your heart that you can’t bear living without them. To make a promise to be with your spouse till-death-do-us-part, and I can believe that people truly love each other unconditionally, but the fact of the matter is, you don’t need to seal it with marriage (clarification: I’m not against marriage, all I’m saying is that it’s not something that’s 100% mandatory; aka marriage isn’t for everyone). There are some people who marry by Principle. Like I said, an institution. It’s just boundaries are so extremely blurred sometimes, that Love deforms into a Principle: On one hand you’ve got Love, like the true uninhibited I’ll-do-anything-for-you-lets-get-married type of Love, and on the far extremist (or conservative, rather) end, you’ve got the principle of getting married, which leaves no room for Love, essentially.

But here’s the kicker: Love as a principle. It could well be possible that 2 seemingly compatible people are together because they believe in Love as a Principle. That again has to do with the attention that our minds are so unconsciously and subconsciously geared to. The abysmal depths of the media. The things people tell us—your parents, your friends, your friends via their parents via their parents via their friends, etc. It’s a bit cyclical and… tiring. The redundancy of being bombarded with the ideal guy or the ideal gal. Movies. Storybooks. Music. Talk shows. Dr. Phil. It becomes so unnoticeably warped that sometimes, I look at my parents, and I can’t help but think, “Are they still together because they love each other? Or because it’s Principle that drives them to view Love and marriage as a mere social construct?” But that’s just me spewing hypotheticals; they get along just fine. It’s just that the communication aspect of our family unit, though there wasn’t much to begin with, has kindof depressingly imploded.

Back to the root of my deferred writing-strike, I can’t bring myself to go to Church anymore. I’d be lying to myself, lying to everyone around me. I’d be relegated to a mere facade of reality, I’d be pouring fuel into fire. Breast-feeding hegemony. I would become a squandering, obsessive-compulsive cleaning-lady who’d find no self-motivation to break unjust and dehumanizing principles. I’d be doing exactly what she would be doing because she can’t seem to break that sanctuary-of-a-bubble that she lives in. But I totally agree with her, the world is a scary place. But not because of what you see or hear on the news. And not because of the reality of what’s out there, or what’s already been said, done, or discovered. Settling with what’s already been given to you, that’s the easy part. The hard part—the hard part is finding and uncovering what hasn’t been discovered.

Anal Retentive

Posted by: Steffi on: April 3, 2010

That’s me refusing to write on this blog-thing.

Also, I’ve developed this uncanny and self-defensive mechanism for sarcasm.

Face it, we all internalize our problems; the real difference lies in how we handle them.

And so, the continuously compounded effect of my deliberately trying to avoid my neurobiology exam, has resulted in this. I can’t concentrate anymore. Really. I’ve tried every possible approach—I’ve tried leaving this blog to rot in its own myriad puss of selfishness. I’ve tried studying at LSM. I’ve tried internalizing my humanity, or what’s left of it, and I’ve even tried password-protecting myself from… myself. Doesn’t work. Does Not Work.

I’ve failed as a human being.

On another note, albeit a bass note or something raspy and slightly more depressing than that, I have again successfully contributed to the downfall of the human race. See, this is the part where I wheel around in circles hoping to land an idea or an excuse for my never-ending bouts of social failure, but I won’t. I’ll skip that.

I need to grow up. And I think it’s almost time actually. It’s time for another turnover; It’s been I’d say, close to a year since I started this thing, and it’s helped me think things through (to some extent anyway). I never meant to humiliate anyone in anyway; I really am sorry if in fact, I did that. And truthfully, all I did was hit up the search box and decided to start a conversation. I mean, yes it was ambiguous and unorthodox and socially not-right, but I honestly didn’t mean to “harm” anyone by it. I didn’t have alterior motives. I asked one question, which turned into another question, which turned into another, then another, and soon enough you have yourself a qualified broken conversation on the internet.

I don’t know, I’m really bad with people. I don’t know how much more or how much longer I can write on this. This blog keeps me sequestered from society. I need to change that. I need to change this. I need to change me.

This was the whole point of Blockbuster. The whole point of direct social contact with other talking, moving, mind-boggling individuals generated to work, compete, and converse all day. That was the point of it all. And I think herein lies the last problem. This blog. This blog has got to go. I’m officially shutting it down. For my sake, and for all of humanity’s sake.

I am however, keeping everything intact. For my purposes, if no one’s. I wanna look back on this someday, and think:  Steffi… what the fuck were you thinking?

[The End]

Tags:

I’m feeling slightly proactive today

Posted by: Steffi on: February 12, 2010

Too bad I’m going to work in half an hour.

In lieu of the snow storm

Posted by: Steffi on: February 10, 2010

Found this really neat site on psychobabble earlier today: We Feel Fine

It’s basically this sort of enormous amassment of quotes based on “tags” of human emotion. But it’s not really your typical quote-whore blog because first off, it’s not a blog. It’s more of like a… a collection of blogs—or rather, relatively short one-liner snippets from various blogs. Random blogs: Yours, mine, your neighbors. Completely random.

Essentially, it works like this: you can choose to filter out adjectives/adverbs of human emotion (i.e. happy), a common age group (i.e. 20s), sex variant (male/female), and even the weather on that particular day (i.e. cloudy). Hit “search” and you’ll find yourself staring at a screen with several dots of the same color bouncing around all over the page. Click on one, and you’ll be surprised.

Additionally, you can also choose not to filter anything out and the dots would hence appear in a variety of different colors, representing the different emotional states related to that specific blog entry that some random-someone from Indonesia blogged about on that particularly sunny day. Pretty cool. The only downside I’d say is, they filter out “tags” using the actual adjective/adverb mentioned in that specific sentence written by whoever-it-is. So you’re not actually getting anything that correlates to lets say “weary” unless the word “weary” is in the sentence of blog-entry-X.

Other than that, it’s a pretty simple concept, albeit something really neat. And though you may get really redundant 3-word literals every now and then (i.e. I am lonely), you’ll find the gems are totally worth it.

Re: The last time I’ve felt Alive… (Part two)

Posted by: Steffi on: February 5, 2010

Maybe it’s that calm-before-the-storm-type feeling. Like when you’re dangling yourself from the edge of a railing or the top of a roof. Or that feeling of euphoria, excitement, and anxiety at the peak of a rollercoaster drop. Or that before-instance when you’re slowly making your way to the top. You let go of the safety, and suddenly, you feel this rush—this unbelievable wave of relief, a sort of ecstatic catharsis… You feel accomplished. And though it may be irrational and inexplicable to juxtapose a longboarding stunt with accomplishment, that’s exactly what it feels like. Like that I’m-gonna-die type of feeling somehow assures you that you’re living.

I love it.

Protected: Re: The last time I’ve felt Alive…

Posted by: Steffi on: February 5, 2010

This post is password protected. To view it please enter your password below:


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.